{"id":14764,"date":"2025-08-19T10:11:39","date_gmt":"2025-08-19T14:11:39","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/jfcy.org\/en\/?post_type=jfcy-in-the-courts&#038;p=14764"},"modified":"2026-03-18T11:04:39","modified_gmt":"2026-03-18T15:04:39","slug":"cbc-media-challenge","status":"publish","type":"jfcy-in-the-courts","link":"https:\/\/jfcy.org\/en\/cases-decisions\/cbc-media-challenge\/","title":{"rendered":"CBC et al v. Canada (Attorney General) [Media Charter Challenge to Youth Privacy Regime in the YCJA]"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>CBC et al v Canada (Attorney General), Superior Court of Justice, Toronto Region, Case File No. CV-24-00732679-0000<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The <em>Youth Criminal Justice Act<\/em> (<em>YCJA<\/em>) protects the privacy of young people in many ways, including by limiting access, use and sharing of youth records. The Canadian Broadcasting Corporation, CTV News, The Globe and Mail Inc., Toronto Star Newspapers Limited and La Presse (\u201cthe applicants\u201d) are challenging the constitutionality of key provisions in the records regime. Specifically they challenge the constitutionality of sections 118, 119, and 129 of the <em>YCJA<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Section 119(1) identifies classes of people who can access youth records on request during the open access period. All other people, including the media, must bring an application to a youth court seeking access to the records. &nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The applicants ask the Court to read the recognized news media into section 119(1) of the <em>YCJA <\/em>as a class of persons presumptively entitled to access to youth court records. Alternatively, they seek a declaration that subsections 118(1) and 119(1)(s) of the <em>YCJA<\/em> are of no force and effect.&nbsp; Section 118(1) prohibits disclosure of youth records and information except as authorized or required by the <em>YCJA<\/em>.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The applicants also seek a declaration that s. 129 is of no force and effect.&nbsp; Section 129 addresses the disclosure and use of the records and information gained under the <em>YCJA<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Recognizing the outcome of this application will affect the rights and interests of children and young people across Canada, JFCY brought a motion for leave to intervene. The Superior Court granted the motion, allowing JFCY to intervene as a friend of the Court and the right to attend witness examinations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The hearing was held on Feb 9 and 10, 2026. We await the decision.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/jfcy.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/JFCY-Factum-CBC-et-al-2026.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">JFCY factum<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>CBC et al v Canada (Attorney General), Superior Court of Justice, Toronto Region, Case File No. CV-24-00732679-0000 The Youth Criminal&mldr;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","class_list":["post-14764","jfcy-in-the-courts","type-jfcy-in-the-courts","status-publish","hentry"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/jfcy.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/jfcy-in-the-courts\/14764","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/jfcy.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/jfcy-in-the-courts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/jfcy.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/jfcy-in-the-courts"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/jfcy.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/jfcy-in-the-courts\/14764\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":15480,"href":"https:\/\/jfcy.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/jfcy-in-the-courts\/14764\/revisions\/15480"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/jfcy.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=14764"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}